A Study of Robotics and its Emerging Applications

Author

Dr. Y. Shireesha, M. Pavani, Y. Kalyani, S. Sai Ganesh, Santosh. A


Abstract

 Robotics is one of the fastest-growing technologies, integrating artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, computer vision, sensors, and automation to improve efficiency, accuracy, and safety across various industries. Modern robotic systems are designed to perform complex, repetitive, and hazardous tasks with minimal human intervention, making them an essential part of technological advancement. This paper presents an overview of four major application areas of robotics: underwater, medical and healthcare, humanoid, and agricultural robotics. Underwater robots are used for ocean exploration, marine research, and inspection of underwater structures. Medical robots support surgery, rehabilitation, patient care, and hospital logistics. Humanoid robots are designed to interact with people and are widely used in healthcare, education, customer service, and industries. Agricultural robots assist in farming operations such as crop monitoring, precision spraying, irrigation, and harvesting, helping to improve productivity and reduce labour requirements. The paper also discusses the key technologies, advantages, challenges, and future scope of robotics. It highlights how intelligent robotic systems are expected to play an important role in scientific research and healthcare.



Keywords

Robotics; Emerging Applications; Underwater Robotics; Medical and Healthcare Robotics; Humanoid Robotics; Agriculture Robotics; Artificial Intelligence; Autonomous Systems; Automation; Robot Technology



Full Text:

Download Paper PDF


References


  • Almalki, F. A., & Angelides, M. C. (2026). Autonomous underwater vehicles and aerial platforms for marine missions. Springer.
  • Widhalm, D., et al. (2025). Design and development of the MeCO open-source autonomous underwater vehicle. arXiv.
  • Wang, J.-L., & Song. (2024). Design and architecture of a slender and flexible underwater robot. Springer.
  • Padrao, P., & Fuentes, J. (2023). Human–robot interface design for underwater robotics teleoperation. arXiv.
  • Polymenis, I., & Haroutunian, M. (2022). Virtual underwater datasets for autonomous inspections. MDPI.
  • Anand, A., et al. (2024). On-device intelligence for AI-enabled bio-inspired AUVs. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3385435
  • Wright, M., et al. (2023). Design and development of MMBAUV. Ocean Engineering, 273, 113968.
  • Mayberry, S., et al. (2025). An open-source underwater robotics platform for aquatic research and exploration. HardwareX, 24, e00715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2025.e00715
  • A soft robot for agile and efficient marine locomotion (DRAGON 3D). (2026).
  • Guerra, J., & Malchikov, A. (2026). Low-load endoluminal navigation with a magnetically actuated medical soft microrobot. Frontiers in Medical Technology.
  • Gatam, A. R. (2025). The feasibility of robotic navigation in single position oblique lateral spine surgery: A technical note and a retrospective study. Frontiers in Surgery.
  • Xie, Y. (2024). Flexible control and trajectory planning of medical two-arm surgical robot. Frontiers in Neurorobotics.
  • Zhang, X. (2023). A non-contact interactive system for multimodal surgical robots based on Leap Motion and visual tags. Frontiers in Neuroscience.
  • Gruijthuijsen, C. (2022). Robotic endoscope control via autonomous instrument tracking. Frontiers in Robotics and AI.
  • Manríquez-Cisterna, R. J. (2026). ROS 4 healthcare: A framework for physiological human sensing for social, assistive, rehabilitation, and medical robotics. Frontiers in Robotics and AI.
  • Smits, J. (2025). Towards autonomous robot-assisted transcatheter heart valve implantation: In vivo teleoperation and phantom validation of AI-guided positioning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI.
  • Nehrujee, A. (2024). The facilitators and barriers to home-based robotic rehabilitation in India: A pilot feasibility study. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences.
  • Huang, Z. (2023). Development and evaluation of a robotic system for lumbar puncture and epidural steroid injection. Frontiers in Neurorobotics.
  • Budjakoski, N. (2022). Task-specific robot base pose optimization for robot-assisted surgeries. Frontiers in Robotics and AI.
  • Ravindra, C., & Pavithra, N. (2026). AI-driven humanoid robot in the service sector. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering.
  • Berns, K., & Ashok, A. (2025). The effects of humanoid robot appearance, emotion, and interaction skills on uncanny valley phenomenon. Actuators, MDPI.
  • Bock, T. (2024). Humanoid robot study: Market development, technological maturity and potential for companies. NEXERY.
  • Darvish, K., Penco, L., et al. (2023). Teleoperation of humanoid robots: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 39(3), 1706–1727.
  • Perugia, G., & Lisy, D. (2022). Human robot interaction and its characteristics. International Journal of Computations, Information and Manufacturing (IJCIM).
  • De Lima, C. R., Khan, S. G., Tufail, M., Shah, S. H., & Maximo, M. (2024). Humanoid robot motion planning: A survey. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 110(86), 1–22.
  • He, T., Xiao, W., Lin, T., Luo, Z., Xu, Z., Jiang, Z., Kautz, J., Liu, C., Shi, G., Wang, X., Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2024). HOVER: Versatile neural whole-body controller for humanoid robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21229. (Published at ICRA 2025).
  • Rojas-Quintero, J. A., & Rodríguez-Liñán, M. C. (2021). A literature review of sensor heads for humanoid robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 143, 103834.
  • Sun, J., Zhang, Q., Han, G., Zhao, W., Yong, Z., He, Y., Wang, J., Cao, J., Guo, Y., & Xu, R. (2025). Trinity: A modular humanoid robot AI system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08338.
  • Wood, L. J., Zaraki, A., Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K. (2021). Developing Kaspar: A humanoid robot for children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(3), 491–508.
  • Liu, S., Lever, G., Wang, Z., Merel, J., Eslami, S. M. A., Hennes, D., Czarnecki, W. M., Tassa, Y., Omidshafiei, S., Abdolmaleki, A., Siegel, N. Y., Hasenclever, L., Marris, L., Tunyasuvunakool, S., Song, H. F., Wulfmeier, M., Muller, P., Haarnoja, T., Tracey, B., Tuyls, K., Graepel, T., & Heess, N. (2022). From motor control to team play in simulated humanoid football. Science Robotics.
  • Baek, E.-T., & Im, D.-Y. (2022). ROS-based unmanned mobile robot platform for agriculture.
  • Moazzam, S. I., Nawaz, T., Qureshi, W. S., Khan, U. S., & Tiwana, M. I. (2023). A W-shaped convolutional network for robust crop and weed classification in agriculture.
  • Balasingham, D., Samarathunga, S., Godakanda Arachchige, G., et al. (2024). SPARROW: Smart precision agriculture robot for ridding of weeds.
  • Linford, J., & Haghshenas-Jaryani, M. (2024). A ground robotic system for crops and soil monitoring and data collection in New Mexico chile pepper farms. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00113-3
  • Affonso, F., Tommaselli, F. A. G., Capezzuto, G., Gasparino, M. V., Chowdhary, G., & Becker, M. (2025). CROW: A self-supervised crop row navigation algorithm for agricultural fields. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-025-02219-2
  • Ospina, R., & Noguchi, N. (2025). Real-time work progress estimation for agricultural robot vehicles.
  • Mukuddem, A., & Amayo, P. (2024). Osiris: Building hierarchical representations for agricultural environments.
  • Mukuddem, A., Speed-Andrews, A., Maweni, T., et al. (2026). Osiris++: Hierarchical representations for robotic-enabled precision agriculture. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2026.1732004
  • Kumar, A., Kamalaksha, S. A., Srividya, R., et al. (2026). Modular 4WD agricultural robot for cutting, collection, and precision seeding: Design and simulation-based evaluation. Scientific Reports. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-44388-6
  • Autonomous and intelligent agricultural robot for precision farming. (n.d.). Agricultural Robotics Research Paper.

 

 

Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons