Assessment of Cable Weight and Inadequate Strain Relief as Contributors to PCB Connector Failures in Industrial Equipment

Author

Wagh Smita Sunil,Vishakha Ravindra Sable, Dhanshri Shantaram Dhanwate

Abstract

 Board-mounted connectors in industrial equipment are frequently blamed for intermittent faults that are, in reality, caused by the mechanical load of the attached cable. This paper assesses how cable weight and inadequate strain relief contribute to failure of printed-circuit-board (PCB) connector solder joints under service vibration. A lever-arm model converts the cable’s weight and its mating housing into a prying moment on the connector, a dynamic amplification factor accounts for vibration, and a Basquin-type stress–life relation estimates fatigue life. A Monte Carlo study of 80,000 virtual connectors, covering four cable types and four strain-relief arrangements (none, cable tie, clamp, and clamp with moulded boot), evaluated the probability of failure within a 20,000-hour design life. Without strain relief the failure probability was 68.3%; it fell to 31.6% with a cable tie, 2.2% with a clamp, and 0.6% with a clamp and boot. The median dynamic stress amplitude was about 9 times the static stress, so cable weight acts mainly through vibration rather than as a static overload. Unsupported cable length, cable mass per metre and vibration level were the dominant factors, and a design chart gives the largest length that may be left unsupported. Design rules and a validation test plan suitable for diploma-level practice are given. The study is model-based; its assumptions are stated and should be verified by testing.

Keywords

Cable weight, connector failure, fatigue, printed circuit board, solder joint, strain relief, vibration.

Full Text:

Download Paper PDF

References

[1] J. H. Lau, Solder Joint Reliability: Theory and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.

[2] D. S. Steinberg, Vibration Analysis for Electronic Equipment, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2000.

[3] R. S. Mroczkowski, Electronic Connector Handbook. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1998.

[4] R. R. Tummala, Fundamentals of Microsystems Packaging. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2001.

[5] O. H. Basquin, “The exponential law of endurance tests,” Proc. ASTM, vol. 10, pp. 625–630, 1910.

[6] N. E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 4th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2012.

[7] R. C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2016.

[8] M. Pecht, Ed., Handbook of Electronic Package Design. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, 1991.

[9] A. Birolini, Reliability Engineering: Theory and Practice, 8th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017.

[10] Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies, IPC-A-610, IPC, Bannockburn, IL, USA.

[11] Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire Harness Assemblies, IPC/WHMA-A-620, IPC, Bannockburn, IL, USA.

[12] Environmental Testing – Part 2-6: Tests – Test Fc: Vibration (Sinusoidal), IEC 60068-2-6, IEC, Geneva, Switzerland.

[13] Environmental Testing – Part 2-64: Tests – Test Fh: Vibration, Broadband Random and Guidance, IEC 60068-2-64, IEC, Geneva, Switzerland.

[14] C. R. Harris et al., “Array programming with NumPy,” Nature, vol. 585, pp. 357–362, Sep. 2020.

[15] A. Saltelli et al., Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 2008.

Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons