The Impact of Project RIPPLES on the Performance of Junior High School Science Teachers in Nueva Vizcaya
Author
Nevelyne C. Kimayong
Abstract
This study assessed the impact of Project RIPPLES (Realizing Improvement in Science Performance and Professional Development through Learning Action Cell and Engagement of Science Educators and Leaders) on the performance of permanent Junior High School Science teachers in the Northern District Secondary Schools of the Schools Division Office (SDO) of Nueva Vizcaya, as the basis for a proposed Developmental Plan. Utilizing a quantitative descriptive-comparative research design, the study analyzed teachers’ Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) ratings, while responses from semi-structured interviews were subjected to thematic analysis to provide additional context for the quantitative findings. Data were gathered from 66 permanent Junior High School Science teachers through complete enumeration. Quantitative performance data were obtained from IPCRF ratings across the Key Result Areas (KRAs) and Plus Factor over a four-school-year period. Frequency count, percentage, weighted mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Scheffé post hoc test, and paired samples t-test were employed to analyze the data.
Findings revealed that the respondents demonstrated an Outstanding level of performance both before and during the implementation of Project RIPPLES. Prior to implementation, statistically significant differences were observed only when teachers were grouped according to years in teaching and school category in selected indicators; age and sex did not significantly influence performance. During implementation, school category remained the only profile variable showing significant differences in selected KRAs, while age, sex, and years in teaching showed no significant differences. Using proportional mean scores to account for differences in IPCRF weights across years, the comparison revealed significant changes in Key Result Area 1, Key Result Area 2, Key Result Area 3, and the Overall Rating. Scores increased in Key Result Area 1 and the Overall Rating, decreased in Key Result Area 2 and Key Result Area 3, and remained unchanged in Key Result Area 4 and the Plus Factor. Interview responses further indicated that while Project RIPPLES contributed to instructional improvement and professional growth, performance was also shaped by school leadership, collegial collaboration, mentoring, teaching experience, resource availability, and participation in other professional development activities.
The study concludes that Project RIPPLES served as a valuable professional development initiative that supported teachers’ competence and sustained their high performance. However, outcomes reflected the combined influence of the project and broader professional and contextual factors rather than the project alone. It is recommended that the Schools Division Office sustain Project RIPPLES while strengthening mentoring systems, collaborative learning, differentiated support, curriculum planning, and school-based mechanisms through the proposed Developmental Plan.
Keywords
Learning Action Cell, professional development, IPCRF, science education, Nueva Vizcaya
Full Text:
Download Paper PDF
References
- Acerit, J. P. (2025). Pedagogical knowledge and performance of teachers in learning action cell sessions: A descriptive-correlational study.International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 83, 210–222. https://sites.google.com/deped.gov.ph/sdoisabelaresearchportal/saringit-research-journal/saringit-volume-5/crystilyn-m-acerit
- Añar, L. E., Barroso, C. J. V., & Manlagaylay, M. P. (2023). The performance of basic education learners in the National Achievement Test. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 69s, 1520–1535. https://jrtdd.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1931
- AlAli, R. M., & Al-Barakat, A. A. (2025). Enhancing young children's science learning through science teachers’ formative assessment practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1503088. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1503088
- Alnahdi, G. H., & Schwab, S. (2023). The impact of gender differences in teachers’ teaching practices and attitudes on students’ math and science achievement in Saudi Arabia: Evidence from TIMSS 2019 data.Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1066843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066843
- Aquino, S. R., K., Cordova, N., Branzuela, J., Batiancila, C., & Tipdas, C. (2023). Transformative learning: A deep dive into SLAC sessions and teacher empowerment.Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education, 15, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10134567 (fixed broken URL)
- Bautista, A., & Ortega-Ruíz, R. (2015). Teacher professional development: International perspectives and approaches. Psychology, Society, and Education, 73, 240–251. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rosario-Ortega-Ruiz/publication/301225857_Teacher_Professional_Development_International_Perspectives_and_Approaches/links/57c55fa608ae496e421263a7/Teacher-Professional-Development-International-Perspectives-and-Approaches.pdf
- Binauhan, A. (2021). Effectiveness of Learning Action Cell (LAC) in improving teaching ability [Unpublished manuscript].
- Cortejo, M. (2022). Barriers to effective professional development implementation in the Philippines: A case study.Philippine Journal of Education, 1001, 56–72.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development.Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
- Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015: Guidelines on the implementation of the Learning Action Cell (LAC) as a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing professional development strategy for teachers.https://www.deped.gov.ph/
- Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016: The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DO_s2016_035.pdf
- Department of Education. (2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DO_s2017_042.pdf
- Department of Education. (2025). Division Memorandum No. 220, s. 2025: Release of the results of the national assessments conducted in School Year 2023–2024. https://www.depeddasma.edu.ph/dm-no-220-s-2025-release-of-the-results-of-the-national-assessments-conducted-in-school-year-sy-2023-2024/
- Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures.Educational Policy, 236, 826–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808328505
- Eborde, A. T., & Escote, M. J. V. (2024). Quantifying the influence of Learning Action Cell to the performance of teachers.Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2310, 1256–1265. https://scimatic.org/storage/journals/11/pdfs/3449.pdf
- Executive Order No. 61, s. 2024. (2024, June 3). Suspending the implementation of Administrative Order No. 25 (s. 2011) and Executive Order No. 80 (s. 2012), as amended.https://lawphil.net/executive/execord/eo2024/eo_61_2024.html
- Gepila, E. C., Jr. (2020). Assessing teachers using Philippine professional standards for teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 83, 739–746. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080325
- Grape, A. (2024). Reports teachers' perceptions of LAC as additional workload.Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 121, 78–89. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/3/21439.pdf
- Gulben, R. T. (2025). Learning action cell implementation and teachers’ performance in Kitaotao II District.Asian Journal of Educational Research, 132, 101–115.
- Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change.Teachers and Teaching, 83, 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
- Hilario, F. F. (2024). Assessment on the implementation of Project POD-LAC at Simona National High School.https://zenodo.org/records/12594042/files/Assessment%20on%20the%20Implementation.pdf
- Jaleco, J. M., & Abo, R. A. (2025). Learning action cell approach and teachers’ pedagogical practices.Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 503, 25–36.
- Kanya, N., Fathoni, A. B., & Ramdani, Z. (2021). Factors affecting teacher performance.International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 104, 1462–1468. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21693
- Kini, T., & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of the research.Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Teaching_Experience_Report_June_2016.pdf
- Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 364, 476–500. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1046255
- Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 193, 205–227. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ554778
- Macayanan, M. M., & Abalos, A. P. (2023). Relationship of secondary teachers’ instructional skills, competencies and teaching performance.Wesleyan Scientific Review, 22. https://www.wesleyan.edu.ph/journals/index.php/WSR/article/view/27
- Magundayao, R. (2023). Teacher participation in Learning Action Cells and its effect on performance ratings: Evidence from the Philippines.Asian Journal of Education and Training, 91, 45–60.
- Malik, S. K., Nasim, U., & Tabassum, F. (2015). Perceived effectiveness of professional development programs of teachers at higher education level.Journal of Education and Practice, 613, 169–180. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080484.pdf (provided in your documents)
- Mendoza, M. G., Peralta, F. G., Anamong, R. L., Bangao, K. K., & Carbonel, J. S. (2017). Learning Action Cell as professional development model: An adaptation of Lesson Study.Presented at the World Association of Lesson Studies. https://www.walsnet.org/2017/program/program/pdf/pp-h1.pdf?form=MG0AV3
- Mizell, H. (2010). Why professional development matters. Learning Forward. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/professional-development-matters.pdf (provided in your documents)
- Morallo, M. B., & Abay, J. R. (2019). Gaps on quality teaching: Assessing teachers’ needs towards the creation of a framework for an extension program on teachers’ professional development. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. https://ioer-imrj.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Gaps-on-Quality-Teaching-Assessing-Teachers%E2%80%99-Needs-Mayumi-B.-Morallo-Jemil-R.-Abay.pdf (provided in your documents)
- Pranoto, I., Juliana, J., & Hasanah, W. (2021). Teacher professional development at scale in Indonesia: A collective case study of three teacher learning centres. Foundation for Information Technology Education and Development. https://tpdatscalecoalition.org/publications/teacher-professional-development-at-scale-in-indonesia/
- Programme for International Student Assessment. (2023). PISA 2022 results. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa
- Prudente, M. S., Garcia, J. A. S., Mistades, V. M., Roleda, L. S., & Talaue, F. T. (2024). Systematic review of professional development programs for teachers in the Philippines. EDCOM II / De La Salle University.https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2024/02/18_Prudente-et-al-Systematic-Review-of-Professional-1.pdf?form=MG0AV3
- Ramli, A. F., Rasul, M. S., & Omar, M. (2024). Issues and challenges in the implementation of professional development programs for design and technology teachers.International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 237, 64–83. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.4
- Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
- Sales, J. P. (2024). Teachers’ experiences in professional development programs: Issues and implications.Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 492, 100–110. https://technoaretepublication.org/socialsciences-humanities/article/exploring-the-learning-action-cell.pdf
- Schools Division of Nueva Vizcaya. (2019). Division Memorandum No. 78, s. 2019.[Original site no longer accessible] Retrieved from former site: https://sdonuevavizcaya.com/category/division-memoranda/
- Soares, F., & Galisson, K. (2020). A typology of professional learning communities (PLC) for Sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, and Nigeria.African Journal of Teacher Education, 9, 110–143. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/04f2/3d165acfd50aa8c934ad252f0d7f423e40d3.pdf
- (2024). What is social learning theory?https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/social-learning-theory
- (2014). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1674unescoroadmap.pdf
- United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality education. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
- Vega, M. G. A. (2020). Investigating the learning action cell (LAC) experiences of science teachers in secondary schools: A multiple case study.IOER Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 21, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3571935
- Verbo, J. R. (2020). The role of Learning Action Cells in enhancing teacher performance in the Philippines: An empirical study.Proceedings of the 25th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics. https://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2020/regular/21782.pdf
- Wongmahesak, K., Muthmainnah, Kaur, D., & Cardoso, L. (2025). Teacher performance: What is it, how important is it, and how can we make it happen sustainably?Asian Education and Learning Review, 32, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14456/aelr.2025.2
Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons