A Review of Multi-Axial Fatigue Testing Machines in Structural Engineering

Author

Vijaiananth S U, Kesavan K M

Abstract

 Structural components such as offshore jacket platform members, tubular joints, wind turbine towers, bridge connections, and pressure-retaining piping are rarely subjected to purely uniaxial cyclic loading in service; they experience combined axial, bending, torsional, and internal-pressure loading arising from wave action, wind, seismic excitation, and operational loads. Multi-axial fatigue testing machines have therefore become essential tools for characterizing material and connection behavior under realistic, combined loading histories. This paper reviews the design principles, classification, instrumentation, and control strategies of multi-axial fatigue testing machines, and compares representative testing rigs reported in the literature in terms of loading capacity, control methodology, and specimen geometry. Applications of these machines in structural engineering, particularly offshore and marine structures, are discussed, along with the principal challenges associated with non-proportional loading control, specimen design, and standardization. The review concludes by identifying emerging trends, including AI-assisted fatigue-life prediction and combined multi-axial corrosion-fatigue testing, which are expected to shape the next generation of multi-axial fatigue test systems.

Keywords

Multi-axial fatigue; fatigue testing machine; non-proportional loading; tubular joints; offshore structures; biaxial testing; axial-torsion.

Full Text:

Download Paper PDF

References

[1] Socie, D.F. and Marquis, G.B., Multiaxial Fatigue, SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 2000.

[2] Karolczuk, A. and Macha, E., A review of critical plane orientations in multiaxial fatigue failure criteria of metallic materials, International Journal of Fracture, 134(3-4), pp. 267-304, 2005.

[3] Shamsaei, N., Fatemi, A. and Socie, D.F., Multiaxial fatigue evaluation using discriminating strain paths, International Journal of Fatigue, 33(4), pp. 597-609, 2011.

[4] Itoh, T. and Sakane, M., Multiaxial low cycle fatigue life prediction under non-proportional loading, International Journal of Fatigue, 33(8), pp. 1025-1031, 2011.

[5] Bruccoleri, C. et al., Development of a biaxial cruciform testing system for thin sheet metal specimens, Experimental Mechanics, 56(9), pp. 1547-1559, 2016.

[6] Lieurade, H.P. et al., Fatigue of welded tubular joints under combined axial and bending loading, International Journal of Fatigue, 25(9-11), pp. 1049-1057, 2003.

[7] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Practice for Verification of Testing Frame and Specimen Alignment Under Tensile and Compressive Axial Force Application, ASTM E1012, 2019.

[8] Kim, K.S. and Park, J.C., Shear strain based multiaxial fatigue criteria and life prediction, International Journal of Fatigue, 21(9), pp. 851-861, 1999.

[9] Zhang, W. et al., Development of a combined tension-torsion-internal pressure fatigue testing rig for offshore tubular members, Marine Structures, 60, pp. 1-15, 2018.

[10] DNV GL, Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures, DNVGL-RP-C203, 2019.

[11] Mayer, H., Fatigue testing at very high cycles under multiaxial loading, International Journal of Fatigue, 22(4), pp. 289-298, 2000.

[12] You, B.R. and Lee, S.B., A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals, International Journal of Fatigue, 18(4), pp. 235-244, 1996.

Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons