Arrest, Personal Liberty and Due Process under the BNSS, 2023: A Constitutional Perspective
Author
Neelam Vishwakarma
Abstract
Arrest is the moment at which the abstract promise of Article 21 becomes a physical fact: a person is stopped, held and removed from ordinary life by the State, often before any court has heard a word. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), in force since 1 July 2024, replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and re-enacted most of its arrest machinery. This paper asks whether the new Sanhita gives constitutional guarantees of liberty and due process a firmer statutory footing, or merely re-labels a framework the Supreme Court had already been forced to repair through judgments such as Joginder Kumar, D.K. Basu and Arnesh Kumar. It argues that the BNSS codifies several judicial safeguards (notice of appearance, disclosure of grounds, informing a nominated person, an undertrial release ceiling) but leaves the decisive questions of necessity, custody and bail to discretion that the text does not discipline. The paper closes by identifying the provisions where fidelity to Articles 21 and 22 depends less on the statute than on judicial enforcement, and proposes targeted reforms.
Keywords
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita; arrest; personal liberty; Article 21; Article 22; due process; police custody; bail.
Full Text:
Download Paper PDF
References
Statutes and constitutional provisions. Constitution of India, Articles 14, 19, 20(3), 21, 22 and 39A. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Chapter V and sections 173, 187, 479, 480, 482 and 483. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, sections 41 to 41D, 46 to 50A, 56, 57, 167, 436A, 437, 438 and 439.
Cases cited.
|
Case
|
Citation
|
Point
|
|
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
|
AIR 1950 SC 27
|
Narrow reading of Article 21
|
|
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
|
(1978) 1 SCC 248
|
Fair, just and reasonable procedure
|
|
Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani
|
(1978) 2 SCC 424
|
Self-incrimination and interrogation
|
|
Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
|
(1978) 4 SCC 494
|
Dignity of prisoners
|
|
Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar
|
(1980) 1 SCC 81
|
Speedy trial, undertrials
|
|
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
|
(1980) 2 SCC 565
|
Anticipatory bail
|
|
Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration
|
(1980) 3 SCC 526
|
Handcuffing
|
|
Khatri v. State of Bihar
|
(1981) 1 SCC 627
|
Legal aid at first production
|
|
Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar
|
(1983) 4 SCC 141
|
Compensation for unlawful detention
|
|
CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni
|
(1992) 3 SCC 141
|
Police custody within first fifteen days
|
|
Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa
|
(1993) 2 SCC 746
|
Compensation for custodial death
|
|
Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P.
|
(1994) 4 SCC 260
|
Arrest and necessity
|
|
Citizens for Democracy v. State of Assam
|
(1995) 3 SCC 743
|
Handcuffing
|
|
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
|
(1997) 1 SCC 416
|
Arrest and custody guidelines
|
|
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra
|
(2011) 1 SCC 694
|
Anticipatory bail
|
|
Manubhai Ratilal Patel v. State of Gujarat
|
(2013) 1 SCC 314
|
Remand and production
|
|
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
|
(2014) 8 SCC 273
|
Arrest checklist and remand
|
|
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
|
(2017) 10 SCC 1
|
Privacy and dignity
|
|
Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam
|
(2017) 15 SCC 67
|
Default bail
|
|
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
|
(2020) 5 SCC 1
|
Anticipatory bail duration
|
|
Bikramjit Singh v. State of Punjab
|
(2020) 10 SCC 616
|
Default bail
|
|
Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI
|
(2022) 10 SCC 51
|
Bail guidelines
|
|
Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India
|
(2024) 7 SCC 576
|
Written grounds of arrest
|
|
Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi)
|
(2024) 8 SCC 254
|
Written grounds, UAPA
|
|
In re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons
|
2024 SCC OnLine SC 3596 (order of 23 Aug 2024)
|
Section 479 BNSS applies retrospectively
|
|
Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana
|
2025
|
Grounds of arrest under Article 22(1)
|
|
Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra
|
Decided 6 Nov 2025
|
Written grounds in all cases
|
|
Dr. Rajinder Rajan v. Union of India
|
Decided April 2026
|
Grounds of arrest
|
Secondary sources consulted for recent developments.
Note on verification. Statutory sub-section numbers and law-report citations in this paper were assembled from the author's working knowledge and a limited set of secondary sources. Before submission, check each against the official gazette text of the BNSS and the official or SCC reports, and confirm the current status of the larger-bench reference on written grounds of arrest.
Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons