COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FUSE, TYPE B, TYPE C, TYPE D MCBS, AND ELCB USING REAL-TIME MONITORING

Author

Prof. M.K.Parve, Mayur Sonkusre Ashwini Mathankar, Dhanashree Lohi, Nilakshi Wanjari, Shimpli Patil

Abstract

 This project presents a comparative analysis of five electrical protection devices: Fuse, Type B MCB, Type C MCB, Type D MCB, and ELCB using a real-time monitoring system. The main objective is to compare their performance under different electrical fault conditions such as overload, short circuit, and earth leakage. The system continuously monitors important electrical parameters such as current and voltage and records the response of each protection device. The devices are evaluated based on their tripping characteristics, response time, and overall protection efficiency. A Fuse provides simple and economical protection, while different MCB types are suitable for different load characteristics. ELCB provides protection against earth-leakage faults. By comparing these devices under similar conditions, the project helps determine the most suitable protection device for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. This study aims to improve electrical safety, reduce equipment damage, provide reliable fault protection, and enhance the overall reliability of electrical systems. 

Keywords

Fuse, MCB, ELCB,

Full Text:

Download Paper PDF

References

[1] K. Emanuelson, R. Eriksson, T. Johansson, J. Kocher-Oberlehner, J. Lakhall, B. Lindholm, R. Persson, and S. Sundstrom, “Life Cycle Assessment of the Miniature Circuit Breaker vs. the Diazed Fuse in Household Installations,” Chalmers University of Technology, Oct. 2001.

[2] V. Cohen, “Miniature and Moulded Case Circuit Breakers: A Historical Review,” SAIEE Historical Interest Group, Jan. 1994.

[3] L. G. Hewitson, M. Brown, and R. Balakrishnan, Practical Power System Protection, Elsevier, 2005.

[4] C. N. M. Ajmal, I. V. Raghavendra, S. Naik, A. Ray, and H. S. Krishnamoorthy, “A Modified Hybrid DC Circuit Breaker With Reduced Arc for Low Voltage DC Grids,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 132267–132277, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3115456.

[5] R. Rodrigues, Y. Du, A. Antoniazzi, and P. Cairoli, “A Review of Solid-State Circuit Breakers,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 364–377, Jan. 2021.

[6] A. Shukla and G. D. Demetriades, “A Survey on Hybrid Circuit-Breaker Topologies,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 627–641, Apr. 2015.

[7] X. Pei, O. Cwikowski, D. S. Vilchis-Rodriguez, M. Barnes, A. C. Smith, and R. Shuttleworth, “A Review of Technologies for MVDC Circuit Breakers,” in Proc. 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Oct. 2016, pp. 3799–3805.

[8] M. R. Vasavada, V. S. Patel, and J. R. Prajapati, “Development of Intelligent Automatic Electronic MCB and ELCB Using Fault Diagnosis Technique,” IEEE.

[9] A. Yadav and V. K. Sharma, “Smart MCB Design using Embedded and IoT System,” in 2023 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), 2023, pp. 1–6.

[10] Sunarto, T. Tohir, Y. Pranahikmat, and Sudrajat, “Design and Construction of ELCB Practical Equipment as Touch Voltage Protection,” in 2025 5th International Symposium on Materials and Electrical Engineering (ISMEE), 2025, pp. 1–5.

[11] C. V. Chiranthan, M. K. Prasad, and R. Y. Shreyas, “Digital MCB,” in International Conference on Smart Technologies for Smart Nation (Smart Tech Con), 2017.

[12] T. V. Deokar, O. Y. Salunkhe, G. J. Ankalgi, and V. D. Kare, “Ultra Fast Acting Electronic Circuit Breaker for Overload Protection,” in Third International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics (AEE-ICB), 2017.

Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons