The Study on Impact of Armed Conflict on Children's Rights and Well Being in India

Author

E. Ragul


Abstract

 Armed conflict in India has a significant impact on children's rights and well-being. The research method followed here is empirical research. A total of 202 samples have been collected out of which all samples have been collected through convenient sampling methods. The impact of armed conflict on children's rights and well-being has evolved over time, with growing recognition of the devastating consequences it can have on children. In the past, children were often seen as passive victims of war, but now they are increasingly recognized as active participants and casualties of conflict. The effects of armed conflict on children can include physical harm, such as injury and death, as well as psychological harm, such as trauma and loss of childhood. The independent variables are gender, age , educational qualification, occupation, place of living .The dependent variables are opinions about the impact of armed conflict on children's rights and well being in India and found that Children in conflict-affected areas face heightened risks of violence, displacement, and disruptions to their education and health. They are often recruited by armed groups and subjected to physical and psychological abuse. The lack of access to essential services, such as food, water, and medical care, can further exacerbate the situation. The long-term effects of conflict can also leave deep scars on children's development, causing problems such as depression, anxiety, and trauma. In conclusion, armed conflict severely undermines children's rights and well-being, and it is crucial for the Indian government and international community to prioritise their protection and support.



Keywords

Violence, Displacement, Psychological abuse, Exacerbate, Trauma, Depression.



Full Text:

Download Paper PDF


References


  1. Barik, S. K., Mishra, S., & Ayyappan, S. (2000). Aquatic Ecology (Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp. 185–204). https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009981319515
  2. Behera, N., Ashok, P., Singh, M. M., Kartic Kumar, M., Kumbha, S., Shukla, G., & Saxena, S. (2022). Implementation of the lattice model in the coexistence of species and its potential consequences on the environment. In the International journal of health sciences (pp. 1106–1128). https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns5.8831
  3. Benk, S., & Gillman, M. (2019). Granger Predictability of Oil Prices After the Great Recession. International Monetary Fund.
  4. Brown, A. (2013). Book Review: Media and Memory. In Media International Australia (Vol. 148, Issue 1, pp. 166–166). https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x1314800129
  5. Byrne, A. (2007). The Politics of Promoting Freedom of Information and Expression in International Librarianship: The IFLA/FAIFE Project.
  6. Chesterman, M. (1986). Contempt by the Media: How the Courts Define It. In The Australian Quarterly (Vol. 58, Issue 4, p. 388). https://doi.org/10.2307/20635399
  7. D’Ascoli, S. (2007). Sentencing Contempt of Court in International Criminal Justice: An Unforeseen Problem Concerning Sentencing and Penalties. In Journal of International Criminal Justice (Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 735–756). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm035
  8. Donnelly, R. C., & Goldfarb, R. (1961). CONTEMPT BY PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES. In The Modern Law Review (Vol. 24, Issue 2, pp. 239–255). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1961.tb02173.x
  9. Foken, T. (2021). Springer Handbook of Atmospheric Measurements. Springer Nature.
  10. Geoffrey Mark Bishop v R. (2013). In Victorian Reports: Vol. 39 VR (pp. 642–654). https://doi.org/10.25291/vr/39-vr-642
  11. Henckaerts, J.-M., Comité international de la Croix-Rouge, & Alvermann, C. (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Hu, Y.-C., Tiwari, S., Trivedi, M. C., & Mishra, K. K. (2020). Ambient Communications and Computer Systems: RACCCS 2019. Springer Nature.
  13. Lescroart, J. (2005). The 13th Juror. Penguin.
  14. Julia, L. D. T. T. De Toledo Temer Lulia, L., Domingues, D. S. (2018). O papel do amicus curiae e das audiências públicas como instrumentos de aperfeiçoamento e legitimidade das decisões no Supremo Tribunal Federal. In REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS (Vol. 11, Issue 04). https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2018.33115
  15. Martel, Y. (2016). The High Mountains of Portugal. Canongate Books.
  16. Merlo, G., & Ribeiro, J. M. (2020). O AMICUS CURIAE NO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL: UMA ANÁLISE SOBRE SEU POTENCIAL DEMOCRÁTICO. In Revista de Iniciação Científica e Extensão da Faculdade de Direito de Franca (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.21207/2675-0104.2019.895
  17. Parameswar, P., Nair, R. J., Easwar, R., & Ravindranath, S. (2018). The Concept of Lifology and Lifometric Career Assessment Inventory: Theory and Implication for Practitioners. In the International Journal of Indian Psychology (Vol. 6, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.25215/0603.017
  18. Schauer, F. (2009). Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Harvard University Press.
  19. Trappel, J., Steemers, J., & Thomass, B. (2015). European Media in Crisis: Values, Risks and Policies. Routledge.
  20. Tsuboi, T., Nielsen, J., & Nagayama, I. (1988). Turner’s syndrome: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of EEG background activity. In Human Genetics (Vol. 78, Issue 3, pp. 206–215). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00291663

 

 

Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons