PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF COMPOSITE TILES FROM POLYPROPYLENE (PLASTIC WASTE), RIVER SAND AND CRUMB WASTE TYRE.

Author

Ruya Pankyes Datep, A.M Kolo, D.A Ajiya, Warji Muhammad Ibrahim


Abstract

 The accumulation of waste polypropylene, uncontrolled river-sand extraction, and stockpiling of end-of-life vehicle tyres are three growing waste-management and resource-depletion problems in the construction sector, yet most existing recycled-tile studies address only two of these waste streams at a time. This study investigated the production and characterization of composite floor tiles fabricated from a ternary blend of waste polypropylene (PP), river sand, and crumb waste-tyre rubber, aimed at developing a durable, low-cost, cement-free flooring material while diverting all three waste streams from disposal. Waste PP was collected, sorted, washed, and melted at 170–190 °C to serve as the binding matrix; river sand was washed, dried, and characterized for moisture content, particle-size distribution, Atterberg limits, and specific gravity; and waste tyres were mechanically shredded into crumb rubber below 1 mm. Three composite mixes (S1, S2, S3) with varying PP–sand–crumb-rubber proportions were cast into 50 mm tile moulds and evaluated for density, water absorption, compressive strength, impact resistance, fire resistance, and chemical resistance in accordance with relevant ASTM standards. The developed tiles achieved water absorption of 2.3–4.3%, compressive strength of 150.9–229.6 N/mm², density of approximately 1690–1760 kg/m³, and impact resistance of 33–40 kN, with all mixes showing negligible mass loss and no visible deterioration after fire- and chemical-resistance exposure. The mix containing the highest PP content (S3) generally gave the best combination of low water absorption and high compressive strength, while the 50% PP mix (S2) gave the best chemical and thermal stability. The results demonstrate that PP–sand–crumb-rubber composite tiles are technically feasible as a sustainable, cement-free alternative to conventional flooring materials. Pilot-scale production trials and long-term durability testing are recommended before commercial adoption, alongside a cost–benefit comparison against conventional cement and ceramic tiles.



Keywords

polypropylene; plastic waste; river sand; crumb rubber; waste tyre; composite floor tiles; sustainable construction materials



Full Text:

Download Paper PDF


References


[1] Kumi-Larbi, A., Yunana, D., Kamsouloum, P., Webster, M., Wilson, D. C. and Cheeseman, C. (2018). Recycling Waste Plastics in Developing Countries: Use of Low-Density Polyethylene Water Sachets to Form Plastic Bonded Sand Blocks. Waste Management, 80: 112-118.

[2] Awoyera, P. O. and Adesina, A. (2020). Plastic Wastes to Construction Products: Status, Limitations and Future Perspective. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 12: e00330.

[3] Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. and Law, K. L. (2017). Production, Use, and Fate of All Plastics Ever Made. Science Advances, 3(7): e1700782.

[4] Statista. (2024). Plastic Waste Worldwide Statistics and Facts. Statista Research Department.

[5] Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, and Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean. Science, 347(6223): 768-771.

[6] Pai, S. and Sawant, S. (2020). Manufacturing of Floor Tiles by Using Polypropylene as a Plastic Waste Material with Manufactured Sand. International Journal of Advanced Study and Research Work, 3(12). doi:10.5281/zenodo.4403494.

[7] Soni, A., Das, P. K., Yusuf, M., Kamyab, H., and Chelliapan, S. (2022). Development of Sand-Plastic Composites as Floor Tiles Using Silica Sand and Recycled Thermoplastics: A Sustainable Approach for Cleaner Production. Scientific Reports, 12: 18921.

[8] UNEP. (2022). Sand and Sustainability: 10 Strategic Recommendations to Avert a Crisis. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

[9] Torres, A., Brandt, J., Lear, K., and Liu, J. (2017). A Looming Tragedy of the Sand Commons. Science, 357(6355): 970-971.

[10] İlkılıç, C., and Aydın, H. (2011). Fuel Production from Waste Vehicle Tires by Catalytic Pyrolysis and Its Application in a Diesel Engine. Fuel Processing Technology, 92(5): 1129-1135.

[11] Revelo, C. F., Correa, M., Aguilar, C., and Colorado, H. A. (2021). Composite Materials Made of Waste Tires and Polyurethane Resin: A Case Study of Flexible Tiles Successfully Applied in Industry. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15: e00629.

[12] Lim, Z. H., Lee, F. W., Mo, K. H., Chin, R. J., Yeap, K. H., and Yew, M. K. (2025). An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties and Thermal Insulation of Foamed Rubberised Polypropylene Fibre Concrete That Incorporates a High Quantity of Crumb Rubber Granules. Polymers, 17(7): 967.

[13] ASTM C109/C109M-21. (2021). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[14] ASTM C642-21. (2021). Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[15] ASTM E1508-19. (2019). Standard Guide for Quantitative Analysis by Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[16] ASTM D543-21. (2021). Standard Practices for Evaluating the Resistance of Plastics to Chemical Reagents. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[17] ASTM C33/C33M-23. (2023). Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[18] ASTM C566-19. (2019). Standard Test Method for Total Evaporable Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[19] ASTM C136/C136M-19. (2019). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[20] ASTM D6913/D6913M-17. (2017). Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[21] ASTM D4318-17e1. (2017). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[22] ASTM C128-22. (2022). Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[23] ASTM E119-20. (2020). Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[24] ASTM D256-23. (2023). Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[25] ASTM E4-22. (2022). Standard Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[26] BS EN 12390-3:2019. (2019). Testing Hardened Concrete Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. British Standards Institution, London.

[27] BS 1377-2:1990. (1990). Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes Part 2: Classification Tests. British Standards Institution, London.

[28] ISO 10545-5:2023. (2023). Ceramic Tiles Part 5: Determination of Impact Resistance by Measurement of Coefficient of Restitution. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

[29] AASHTO T255-20. (2020). Standard Method of Test for Total Evaporable Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

[30] Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of Concrete. 5th ed. Pearson Education, Harlow, UK.

[31] Das, B. M., And Sobhan, K. (2018). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 9th ed. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.

[32] Head, K. H. (2006). Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing, Volume 1: Soil Classification and Compaction Tests. 3rd ed. Whittles Publishing, Caithness, UK.

[33] Bowles, J. E. (1996). Foundation Analysis and Design. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[34] Shetty, M. S. (2019). Concrete Technology: Theory and Practice. S. Chand Publishing, New Delhi.

[35] Marušić, D., And Jagodnik, V. (2025). Atterberg Limits Determination and Soil Classification Using Fall Cone Device on the Silty Sands and Sandy Silts. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 19(1–3): 78-87.

[36] Saikia, N., And de Brito, J. (2012). Use of Plastic Waste as Aggregate in Cement Mortar and Concrete Preparation: A Review. Construction and Building Materials, 34: 385 401.

[37] Siddique, R., Khatib, J., And Kaur, I. (2008). Use of Recycled Plastic in Concrete: A Review. Waste Management, 28(10): 1835-1852.

[38] Khadka, D. B., Bhandari, P., And Pakhrin, S. (2023). Development of Composite Floor Tiles of Sand and Recycled Thermoplastics Mixture: A Sustainable Approach for Building Material Production. Journal of Innovations in Engineering (NepJOL), 2023.

[39] BS EN 1097-6:2022. (2022). Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates Part 6: Determination of Particle Density and Water Absorption. British Standards Institution, London.

 

Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons