GROUNDED THEORY-BASED INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF TRANSLANGUAGING PRACTICE IN ENGLISH CLASSES

Author

QUIMING CLARISSA S., JONALYN S. LACAMBRA

Abstract

 This study investigates the role and impact of translanguaging in multilingual English language classrooms within the Nueva Segovia Archdiocesan Catholic Schools (NUSACS) in the Philippines. Amidst a shifting policy environment that now designates Filipino and English as primary media of instruction, this research addresses the gap in understanding how translanguaging practices are enacted and how they influence meaning construction and learners engagement. Employing a qualitative research design anchored in Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT), the study analyzed data from teacher interviews and classroom observations. The findings reveal that translanguaging serves as a crucial pedagogical mechanism, mediating the interaction between teachers' instructional strategies and learners learning experiences. Teachers strategically employ translanguaging through practices such as vocabulary translation, bilingual explanations, mixed-language discussions, and allowing initial idea formulation in learners first languages (Filipino and Ilocano). These strategies facilitate the co-construction of meaning, enhance comprehension of complex concepts, and increase student participation by reducing language anxiety and fostering communicative confidence. The emergent grounded theory, "Translanguaging-Mediated Classroom Engagement Theory," posits that translanguaging is not merely a linguistic accommodation but a deliberate pedagogical approach that leverages learner’s full linguistic repertoires to support both understanding and engagement in English language learning. The study concludes that translanguaging is a vital practice for creating inclusive and effective learning environments in multilingual contexts, offering practical insights for teacher development and classroom language policy.

Keywords

Translanguaging, Meaning Construction, Student Engagement

Full Text:

Download Paper PDF

References

Atta, A., & Naqvi, S. B. (2022). Pedagogical translanguaging in English as a second language (ESL) classrooms: A survey of existing studies. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 120–146.https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp120-146

Back, M., Han, M., & Weng, S. (2020). Emotional scaffolding for emergent multilingual learners through translanguaging: Case stories. Language and Education, 34(4), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2019.1706551

Bisai, S., & Singh, S. (2024). Translanguaging: Centralizing the learner in multilingual classroom transactions. Mextesol Journal, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v48n3-1

Caballero, M. (2024). Translanguaging as creative expression in Philippine multilingual classrooms [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of the Philippines. Canagarajah, A. S. (2023).Translingual practices: Communication, creativity, and pedagogy. Routledge.

Castillo, R. (2025). Peer-mediated translanguaging: Collaborative learning in regional language contexts. Philippine Journal of Education, 104(1), 78–95.

Chaika, O. (2023). Translanguaging in multilingual classrooms: A case study analysis. Fìlologìčnij Časopis, 1, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.31499/2415-8828.1.2023.281366

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.

Dela Cruz, A. (2025). Translanguaging in the Ilocano-English classroom: Practices and perceptions. NUSACS Research Journal, 8, 34–52. Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/orders

Ezeh, N. G., Umeh, I. A., & Anyanwu, E. C. (2022). Code switching and code mixing in teaching And learning English as a second language: Building on knowledge. English Language Teaching,15(9), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n9p106

Foley, J., Hassett, A., & Williams, E. (2024). ‘It’s why you get up in the morning’: A Straussian grounded theory study of coping in police officers who investigate rape and child abuse. The Police Journal, 97(4), 804–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X231197262

García, O., & Wei, L. (2022). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87742-2

Gatil, L. (2023). Translanguaging in Philippine schools: Alignment with MTB-MLE and Curriculum goals. Philippine Linguistics Journal, 45(2), 89–106.

Hanasan, D. J. D., & Cabanatan, J. L. (2024). Translanguaging spaces in the educational setting: The case of English senior high school teachers. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(5), 1057–1074.
https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2024.1105071

Li, W. (2023). Translanguaging as theory and practice. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(1), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0089

Manalo, J. (2024). Natural translanguaging: Students’ linguistic practices in daily learning. Philippine Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 45–61.

Nursanti, R. R. (2021). Classroom strategies through translanguaging for multilingual students. ENGLIE: English Language Innovation Journal, 2(1), 17 27https://doi.org/10.22219/ENGLIE.V2I1.14653

Sagosoy, L., et al. (2024). Translanguaging support for struggling readers in regional schools. Ilocos Sur Educational Research Journal, 12, 89–104.

Scott, J. A., & Cohen, S. (2023). Multilingual, multimodal, and multidisciplinary: Deaf students and translanguaging in content area classes. Languages, 8(1), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010055

Song, J., Howard, D., & Olazabal-Arias, W. (2022). Translanguaging as a strategy for Supporting multilingual learners’ social emotional learning. Education Sciences, 12(7), Article 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070475

Tai, K. W. H., & Li, L. (2025). Leveraging mutually shared knowledge. [Journal/Source name missing].

Tekin, S. (2023). Translanguaging strategies with pre-service EFL teachers in EMI classrooms: An emic perspective. Rumelide Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 35, 1242–1257. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1342277

Thongwichit, N., & Ulla, M. B. (2024). Translanguaging pedagogy in Thailand’s English medium Of instruction classrooms: Teachers’ perspectives and practices. TESL-EJ, 24(4), Article 4. https://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej100/a4.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wei, L. (2022). Translanguaging as creative and critical practice. Applied Linguistics, 43(5), 890–912. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac039

Yusuf, M. (2025). Translanguaging effects on speaking, listening, and classroom participation. International Journal of English Linguistics, 15(1), 78–92.

Zhang, H. (2023). Translanguaging and higher-order thinking: Expressing complex ideas. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), Article 102345.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648- 023-09876-5

Share your valuable work from Social Media Buttons